|
by Megan Nielsen
Initially, when this phenomenon began a few years ago, I grew angry at my students and the world in general. I’d read all about AI, discussed it in my classes and with peers, and I couldn’t understand why anyone would want to use it. It steals material from artists and writers without their consent or compensation, it’s ruining the environment with its massive amounts of water usage, and worst of all, it isn’t even right most of the time. It makes up both sources and facts, and I wouldn’t stand for it. I knew I had to stop my students from conferring with the evil machine at any cost. First, I tried lectures during my weekly sessions with groups of freshmen, a traditional “I talk, you listen” approach that I would quickly learn does next to nothing. Looking back, it’s obvious that starting with “I have the moral high ground and here’s why you’re wrong” wouldn’t work, but I didn’t know that there was any other way to approach it. I was so blinded by my disgust with AI (that I still hold, mind you, but I’m calmer now) that I came to the table with only anger. I would go on and on about the terrible drawbacks of ChatGPT, while never once opening the floor for discussion. I was met with blank stares at best, with most students never even looking up from their laptops. I quickly got discouraged and depressed. I couldn’t see how I could convince my students to turn away if they knew the ethical implications and simply didn’t care. ChatGPT was here to stay, and it was time for me to accept the inevitable and get with the times. Right? It was around this time that I realized I’d been going about it all wrong.
I had the sudden revelation that, amidst my crusade, I had never once considered the root problem for why students were turning to AI in such large numbers: they’re terrified of failure. They think that college-level writing is beyond them, and they’ll be ridiculed if they aren’t immediately perfect. They’re terrified of being wrong, and they’re convinced that the computers are smarter than they are. After acquiring this knowledge, I changed my approach to my students, and the improvement was immediate. When a student appeared to be struggling, I got more involved than ever before. Previously, I’d been worried about being “too much,” in fear of my students thinking that I found them incompetent. However, I found that the majority of students embraced it when I dove into their projects headfirst right along with them. Together, we trudged through brainstorming, first drafts, complete overhaul revisions, proofreading, and any stage of the writing process you can think of. I learned two extremely valuable approaches for when students get stuck, and they’ve helped me get through nearly every situation:
Even with my newfound approach, students do still sometimes turn to AI in front of me. When this happens, I no longer immediately turn to critique. Instead, I do the opposite, and find as much to praise about their work as I possibly can (no matter how hard that can be sometimes). I find something that shows them how smart they are, and how much they’re capable of when they put in the work. Nothing is more capable of reaching full potential than a student with newfound comfort and confidence. Nothing is more powerful than a student who believes in their own mind.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Categories
All
Archives
December 2025
|
|
Glassworks is a publication of Rowan University's Master of Arts in Writing 260 Victoria Street • Glassboro, New Jersey 08028 [email protected] |
All Content on this Site (c) 2025 Glassworks
|
RSS Feed