GLASSWORKS
  • home
  • about
    • history
    • staff bios
    • community outreach
    • affiliations
    • contact
  • Current Issue
    • read Issue 31
    • letter from the editor
    • looking glass fall 2025
    • interview with Suzi Ehtesham-Zadeh
  • submit
    • submission guidelines
  • looking glass
    • fall 2025
  • editorial content
    • book reviews
    • opinion
    • interviews
  • flash glass
    • flash glass 2025
    • flash glass 2024
    • flash glass 2023
    • flash glass 2022
    • flash glass 2021
    • flash glass 2020
    • flash glass 2019
    • flash glass 2018
    • flash glass 2017
    • flash glass 2016
    • flash glass 2015
  • media
    • audio
    • video
  • archive
    • best of the net nominees
    • pushcart prize nominees
    • read and order back issues
  • Master of Arts in Writing Program
    • about Rowan University's MA in Writing
    • application and requirements
  • Newsletter
  • home
  • about
    • history
    • staff bios
    • community outreach
    • affiliations
    • contact
  • Current Issue
    • read Issue 31
    • letter from the editor
    • looking glass fall 2025
    • interview with Suzi Ehtesham-Zadeh
  • submit
    • submission guidelines
  • looking glass
    • fall 2025
  • editorial content
    • book reviews
    • opinion
    • interviews
  • flash glass
    • flash glass 2025
    • flash glass 2024
    • flash glass 2023
    • flash glass 2022
    • flash glass 2021
    • flash glass 2020
    • flash glass 2019
    • flash glass 2018
    • flash glass 2017
    • flash glass 2016
    • flash glass 2015
  • media
    • audio
    • video
  • archive
    • best of the net nominees
    • pushcart prize nominees
    • read and order back issues
  • Master of Arts in Writing Program
    • about Rowan University's MA in Writing
    • application and requirements
  • Newsletter
GLASSWORKS

AI in the Composition Classroom: Students Aren’t Stupid, They’re Scared

12/1/2025

0 Comments

 
by Megan Nielsen
It’s 2025, and I work in a college writing center. Of course, AI usage has run rampant in recent years. ChatGPT haunts me at work, constantly looming over me. One day, I’m shown a paper in a document with the AI prompt still sitting at the top of the page. The next day, I ask students a question, and many of them pull up ChatGPT right in front of me, with no shame, and robotically plug the question in for a response. ChatGPT is the new Google, except now when I ask students for sources, they can’t point me to a website or journal. They can only refer me to their all-knowing robot god.
Picture
Image by Jonathan Kemper on Unsplash
Initially, when this phenomenon began a few years ago, I grew angry at my students and the world in general. I’d read all about AI, discussed it in my classes and with peers, and I couldn’t understand why anyone would want to use it. It steals material from artists and writers without their consent or compensation, it’s ruining the environment with its massive amounts of water usage, and worst of all, it isn’t even right most of the time. It makes up both sources and facts, and I wouldn’t stand for it. I knew I had to stop my students from conferring with the evil machine at any cost.
First, I tried lectures during my weekly sessions with groups of freshmen, a traditional “I talk, you listen” approach that I would quickly learn does next to nothing. Looking back, it’s obvious that starting with “I have the moral high ground and here’s why you’re wrong” wouldn’t work, but I didn’t know that there was any other way to approach it. I was so blinded by my disgust with AI (that I still hold, mind you, but I’m calmer now) that I came to the table with only anger. I would go on and on about the terrible drawbacks of ChatGPT, while never once opening the floor for discussion. I was met with blank stares at best, with most students never even looking up from their laptops.
I quickly got discouraged and depressed. I couldn’t see how I could convince my students to turn away if they knew the ethical implications and simply didn’t care. ChatGPT was here to stay, and it was time for me to accept the inevitable and get with the times. Right?
It was around this time that I realized I’d been going about it all wrong.
Picture
Image by Vitaly Gariev on Unsplash
After my AI-induced existential crisis, I was helping a student struggling with starting her paper. We were brainstorming topics and beginning on an outline, and she was clearly beginning to panic. As predicted, she suggested asking ChatGPT. Despite myself, I asked her why she thought that, barely withholding my annoyance. Her response shocked me:
“Because it’ll be better than what I could do.”
I had the sudden revelation that, amidst my crusade, I had never once considered the root problem for why students were turning to AI in such large numbers: they’re terrified of failure. They think that college-level writing is beyond them, and they’ll be ridiculed if they aren’t immediately perfect. They’re terrified of being wrong, and they’re convinced that the computers are smarter than they are. After acquiring this knowledge, I changed my approach to my students, and the improvement was immediate.
When a student appeared to be struggling, I got more involved than ever before. Previously, I’d been worried about being “too much,” in fear of my students thinking that I found them incompetent. However, I found that the majority of students embraced it when I dove into their projects headfirst right along with them. Together, we trudged through brainstorming, first drafts, complete overhaul revisions, proofreading, and any stage of the writing process you can think of. I learned two extremely valuable approaches for when students get stuck, and they’ve helped me get through nearly every situation:
  1. Break every assignment down into parts. As small as possible. When students get overwhelmed and turn to AI, it’s because they can only see their work as a giant, herculean task, and they don’t know where to begin. Show them that a 10-page paper doesn’t get spit out in one go. You brainstorm, and then you draft, and then you change things, and you do it all over again. Even when a student can only stay with me for half an hour, I always make sure to send them off with the next steps. Many students can get going on their own if only they’re given a roadmap.
  2. ​Emphasize the importance of the writing process. Ensure students that no one expects them to be perfect right off the bat, ESPECIALLY if they’re a freshman. Show them that college isn’t some magical place where geniuses go to perfect their already perfect work. Growth takes time, and it’s okay for your work not to be perfect off the bat. In fact, it’s okay for your work to outright suck. What matters is what you learn from it and how you can take criticism and improve in the future.
Picture
Image by Marissa Grootes on Unsplash
Even with my newfound approach, students do still sometimes turn to AI in front of me. When this happens, I no longer immediately turn to critique. Instead, I do the opposite, and find as much to praise about their work as I possibly can (no matter how hard that can be sometimes). I find something that shows them how smart they are, and how much they’re capable of when they put in the work. Nothing is more capable of reaching full potential than a student with newfound comfort and confidence. Nothing is more powerful than a student who believes in their own mind.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Accessibility
    Art
    Bestseller
    Books
    Bookstores
    Career
    Censorship
    Characters
    Cliche
    Code-switching
    Comedy
    Controversy
    Culture
    Dystopian
    Education
    Fandom
    Fantasy
    Fiction
    Future
    Gender
    Genre
    Grammar
    Habits
    Health
    Identity
    Language
    LGBTQ
    Literacy
    Literature
    Media
    Mental Health
    Multimodal
    Music
    Nonfiction
    Normalcy
    Pandemic
    Poetry
    Politics
    Pop Culture
    Process
    Publishing
    Race
    Research
    Rhetoric
    Science Fiction
    Series
    Social Media
    Sports
    Standards
    Storytelling
    Technology
    TV/Film
    Visual Storytelling
    Workshop
    Writing
    Young Adult


    Archives

    December 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    September 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    October 2014
    April 2014
    January 2014
    March 2013
    February 2013


    RSS Feed


Picture

Glassworks is a publication of
​Rowan University's Master of Arts in Writing
260 Victoria Street • Glassboro, New Jersey 08028 
[email protected]

Picture
​All Content on this Site (c) 2025 Glassworks
Photos from RomitaGirl67, andreavallejos, wuestenigel, brizzle born and bred, educators.co.uk, kevinmarsh, steevithak