Glassworks
  • home
  • about
    • history
    • masthead
    • staff bios
    • community outreach
    • affiliations
    • contact
  • current issue
    • read Issue 21
    • letter from the editor
    • looking glass fall 2020
    • interview with Porsha Olayiwola
    • new book reviews
    • new opinion editorials
  • submit
    • submission guidelines
  • looking glass
    • fall 2020
    • spring 2020
    • fall 2019
    • spring 2019
    • fall 2018
    • spring 2018
    • fall 2017
    • apprentice 2017
    • spring 2017
    • fall 2016
    • spring 2016
    • fall 2015
    • spring 2015
    • fall 2014
    • spring 2014
    • spring 2012
    • winter 2012
    • fall 2011
  • editorial content
    • book reviews
    • opinion
    • interviews >
      • Ed Briant
      • Eugene Cross
      • Josh Denslow
      • Christopher DeWan
      • Katherine Flannery Dering >
        • Aftermath
      • Eric Dyer
      • Julie Enszer >
        • Avowed
      • Mitchell Fink
      • Olivia Gatwood
      • David Gerrold
      • Cynthia Graham
      • Ernest Hilbert
      • Paul Lisicky >
        • The Roofers
      • Scott McCloud
      • Jan Millsapps
      • Anis Mojgani
      • Pedram Navab
      • Kelly Norris
      • Porsha Olayiwola
      • Michael Pagdon
      • Aimee Parkison >
        • The Petals of Your Eyes
      • Brad Parks
      • Chris Rakunas
      • Carlos Ramos
      • Mary Salvante
      • Jill Smolowe
      • Jayne Thompson
      • Julie Marie Wade
      • Melissa Wiley
  • flash glass
    • flash glass 2020
    • flash glass 2019
    • flash glass 2018
    • flash glass 2017
    • flash glass 2016
    • flash glass 2015
  • media
    • art
    • photography
    • audio
    • video
    • new media
  • archive
    • read past issues
    • order print issues
  • Master of Arts in Writing program
    • about Writing Arts at Rowan University
    • application and requirements
  • newsletter

Obscenity In Modern Lit: Where Do We Draw the Line?

3/16/2015

0 Comments

 
by Kaitlin Zeilman

Human beings are artistic and creative by nature. There always should be a conduit for fresh ideas not only to enrich the mind, but also to enlarge possibilities for the world in general. Limiting the options for the creative freedom of others never should be considered an option. Does anyone really think a law could have stopped Chopin, Huxley, or Salinger from writing some of the greatest works of our time?


Author Martin C. Dillon from SUNY Binghamton said everyone has different notions of what could be considered obscene. Authors depict or allude to the subject of sexuality or innuendo differently based on personal style, or per each individual body of work. Where do we draw the line for the sake of creative and artistic freedom?  Classics such as Lady Chatterley’s Lover and Madame Bovary have been banned from some libraries and schools because of the sexual content, yet these books are considered by many to be highly respected literary art. Where does the gauntlet fall?

Should lawmakers and conservative groups be able to limit what might seemingly be uncomfortable to some, even if such literary works have a message that extends far beyond the face value of the content?

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
(Photos courtesy of Flickr and Wikipedia.)
Picture

Obscenity, vulgarity, and "objectionable content" have different definitions and degrees depending on the individual. In his book,
The Phenomenon of Obscenity in Literature: The Specification of a Value by SUNY Binghamton's Dillon says "to call a thing by its own name is a necessary step in treating it properly.” This thought has been echoed many times in the attempt to define what is objectionable vs. what is art throughout the history of our society.

In her book, The Reinvention of Obscenity, author Joan Dejean says the concept of obscenity and censorship started coming into play when tradition began to take on new meaning. In other words, according to Dejean, “literary phenomenon vs. threat to society.” Stories such as The Color Purple and Huckleberry Finn reflect the time period in which they were written. Conservative groups, she argues, should not ban accurate depictions of what really happened just because they don’t like the way it sounds.

The legal battles over obscenity in any kind of widely disseminated literature are documented to have started in the 1800’s and continue today. This earlier period was a time of adjustment for the United States, as the country still was recovering from the wounds of the Civil War. Women just were starting their big move towards wider independence, as many more were able to attend college and get an education outside of the home. The U.S Supreme Court tried to define the essence of censorship many times. There was the Comstock Law (1873) and the case of Regina v. Hicklin (1868), which was applied to test the content of both Theodore Dreiser’s An American Tragedy and Lady Chatterley’s Lover. Roth v. US was another important ruling in the path to crafting an understanding and approachable balance between obscenity and art. This case stated that social importance would be a much more valid determining factor on whether a work could be protected under the First Amendment of the Constitution. The original decisions from 1868 and 1873 were changed because of Roth v. US. 

Judgment in general, is a side effect of the current political climate, and whatever the state of human nature is at that moment. It requires more energy to remain impartial and look for the value in a piece of printed prose that we as people might not necessarily like or agree with. The conclusions many of these cases reached show it is up to the individual to judge the value of a literary work as it applies to his or her life. Strong judgments about a piece of literature are just what they appear to be: one person’s opinion of society’s intrinsic need for that work. Who are we to tell others that something they have enjoyed reading is of no value, solely because of our personal or moral objections to the content? The real illustration of the social need for such works that test the moral bounds of society should be how well they have stood the test of time. Why do so many people learn from a specific book? What do they take away from it? How is it that they obtain information through the text? How many different ways can this book or piece of work be evaluated? These are the questions that educators, librarians, and other academics need to ask before whisking something off to a banned books list.

The definition of obscenity is becoming increasingly difficult to determine, especially in a modern context. Because of the many legal battles swirling over the definition of what exactly the term “obscenity” means, let’s loosely definite it here as something that could be potentially offensive to a person’s moral code of conduct. The  definition of obscenity should not only be based on social need for the content,  and the clarity of message, but also on whether new generations will continue to reap the same benefits from the text that previous generations fought over. The eventual conclusion should be that, much like people, literature continues to evolve . . . and so does public and private opinion. If we had chosen to ban every book that a school board or PTA group didn’t like, we wouldn’t have classics such as Ellis’ American Psycho, Vonnegut’s Cat’s Cradle and Slaughterhouse Five, or Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein to shape our cultural landscape. One person cannot possibly tackle the differences of opinion in the art vs. obscenity battle. However, it is important that we realize there should be no compromise when it comes to protecting the creative aspect at the core of human expression.


0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    thoughts on  writing, art, & new media by glassworks editorial staFF

     


    Archives

    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    October 2014
    April 2014
    January 2014
    March 2013
    February 2013


    Categories

    All
    50 Shades Of Grey
    Adventure Time
    Amazon
    Art
    Audio
    Autocomplete
    Best Seller
    Bibliotherapy
    Books
    Bookstores
    Book To Movie
    Britannica
    Cartoons
    Censorship
    Characters
    Chooseyourownadventure
    Cliche
    Code Switching
    Controversy
    Drag Queens
    Dystopian
    Editorial
    Education
    Emoji
    Encyclopedia
    Facebook
    Fandom
    Fanfiction
    Fantasy
    Fiction
    Fight Club
    Film
    Football
    Future
    Gamebooks
    Game Of Thrones
    Gender
    Genre
    Google
    Google Poetics
    Google Poetry
    Grammar
    Habits
    Halloween
    Health
    Identity
    Insta-love
    Journaling
    Julia Cameron
    Kinesthetic Learning
    Language
    Library
    Literature
    Manga
    Marginalia
    Media
    Mental Health
    Morning Pages
    Multi Modal
    Multi-modal
    New Media
    Nihilism
    Nonfiction
    Normalcy
    Nostalgia
    Obscenity
    Op Ed
    Op-Ed
    Opinion
    Over The Garden Wall
    Podcast
    Poetry
    Politics
    Pornography
    Pronoun
    Publishing
    Race
    Research
    Rhetoric
    Rules
    Sampsa Nuotio
    Scandal
    Science Fiction
    Search
    Self Publishing
    Self-publishing
    Sequels
    Series
    Sexism
    Slam-poetry
    Social Media
    Spoken Word
    Standards
    Steven Universe
    Superheroes
    Teaching
    Technology
    Television
    The Goldfinch
    The New York Times
    Trigger Warnings
    Trilogy
    Twilight
    Video Games
    Visual Novel
    War
    White Vernacular English
    Wikipedia
    Workshop
    Writing
    YA
    Young Adult

    RSS Feed

Picture

260 Victoria Street • Glassboro, New Jersey 08028 
glassworksmagazine@rowan.edu

All Content on this Site
(C) 2021 glassworks
Photos used under Creative Commons from RomitaGirl67, ** RCB **, George Fox Evangelical Seminary