Glassworks
  • home
  • about
    • history
    • masthead
    • staff bios
    • community outreach
    • affiliations
    • contact
  • current issue
    • read Issue 17
    • letter from the editor
    • looking glass fall 2018
    • interview with Melissa Wiley
    • new book reviews
    • new opinion editorials
  • submit
    • submission guidelines
  • looking glass
    • fall 2018
    • spring 2018
    • fall 2017
    • apprentice 2017
    • spring 2017
    • fall 2016
    • spring 2016
    • fall 2015
    • spring 2015
    • fall 2014
    • spring 2014
    • spring 2012
    • winter 2012
    • fall 2011
  • editorial content
    • opinion
    • book reviews
    • interviews >
      • Ed Briant
      • Eugene Cross
      • Christopher DeWan
      • Eric Dyer
      • Julie Enszer >
        • Avowed
      • Mitchell Fink
      • Olivia Gatwood
      • David Gerrold
      • Cynthia Graham
      • Ernest Hilbert
      • Paul Lisicky >
        • The Roofers
      • Scott McCloud
      • Jan Millsapps
      • Anis Mojgani
      • Pedram Navab
      • Michael Pagdon
      • Aimee Parkison >
        • The Petals of Your Eyes
      • Brad Parks
      • Chris Rakunas
      • Carlos Ramos
      • Mary Salvante
      • Jill Smolowe
      • Julie Marie Wade
      • Melissa Wiley
  • flash glass
    • flash glass 2019
    • flash glass 2018
    • flash glass 2017
    • flash glass 2016
    • flash glass 2015
  • media
    • art
    • photography
    • audio
    • video
    • new media
  • archive
    • past issues
    • order print issues
  • Master of Arts in Writing program
    • about Writing Arts at Rowan University
    • application and requirements
  • Newsletter

Stop Hating on “They:” Language Evolution and Gender Pronouns

4/15/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
by Jessica O'Shea

American English Grammar. A 300 level course. At 8:00 a.m. I took my seat, mid row, and looked down to find a single slip of paper on my desk. One sat on each desk and as each student filed in, a buzzing silence filled the room.

Everyone wants a slice of cake for themselves. 

The only text on the paper. The professor, a woman who had taught the course many times, took her position at the front. She asked us what, if anything, was grammatically wrong with the sentence. Silence reigned. One girl bravely raised her hand. “Nothing?”  The professor’s smile was grim. Incorrect. You’ve failed. Return to grade school, do not pass Go. 
The rule in English is that pronouns must agree with nouns in number and gender, so everyone is singular and gender neutral. While themselves is plural (a gender in and of itself in our language), the sentence should read: Everyone wants a slice of cake for him or her self. I know, it’s a tricky system. Yet, that same professor said something that, again, caused a confused silence to fall. “Language,” she said, “changes.” Go back to that test sentence. Maybe it’s not wrong. 
Using the traditional he/she/him/her/his/hers has been publicly out of touch since the mid-nineteenth century. An 1852 newspaper report called for the invention of a new pronoun “of the common gender,” and later an 1884 article printed in the New-York Commercial Advertiser proposed new pronouns ne, nis, nir and hiser.  Both wanted to define a common gender, meaning that it could be applied to all peoples regardless of personal gender identification. It has been tried many times over the centuries, but the issue is that no one can can get a new pronoun to stick. This is because language has historically evolved in an organic way that is resistant to artificial influence. It happens when it happens, however it wants to happen, and we just have to live with it.

Hold on, this is not a reason to despair, as a gender neutral singular is making it’s way to the forefront. Remember the test sentence? 

Common language is rapidly incorporating ‘they’ as more than a plural, but as the stand in for the cumbersome and non-inclusive ‘he or she.’ It is not uncommon to read sentences where ‘them’ or ‘they’ stands as the singular neutral, for example: Sam went to the store and they picked up mayo. ‘Them/they/their’ is already a part of our language, it is gender neutral, and it is naturally progressing to take the place of the common pronoun.

Naturally, people hate it. The hatred stems from two main sources. The first is the those that simply believe ‘they’ as a singular to be wrong grammatically, as in, it’s not in the textbooks so it’s not in the language. These are the same people who resisted the because-noun preposition (think: Because science!) and generally believe ‘slang’ is a curse word. It is the change that is feared in this situation. The other opposition comes from the social/religious angle, where the rejection of the he/she pronouns threatens the status quo, much like gay marriage and pro-choice is thought to. Resistance in this arena is entirely expected, as the modern push for a common pronoun stems largely from the explosion of acceptance for non-traditional gender identification. A ‘he’ can be biologically a ‘he’ but self-identify as something entirely different, ranging from the reverse “she” to identifiers like ze/zir, xe/xyr, co, or e/em.

Yet for the moment, let’s go back to that fear of language evolution.  Did you know that ‘you’ used to be entirely plural? In modern English, ‘you’ is both singular and plural, as well as genderless, meaning that it can be applied to a group: Are you guys going to the movies? Or to a single individual: Sam, will you go to the movies with me?

Previously, in Middle English, which was spoken roughly between the 12th and 15th century (Middle Ages), to refer to a single individual one had to use ‘thou,’ ‘thee,’ or ‘thy.’ These have gone out of style, unless you’re channeling Shakespeare, absorbed over time into the then plural form ‘ye/you/your.’ Middle English is the basis of modern English, when Latin structures began to integrate into the more fluid English speech, and so much of our pronouns today developed directly out of it.

That was what my grammar professor meant when she said that language changes. The rules matter, but only until they don’t. Think about the ‘i before e, except after c,’rule, which doesn’t apply for ‘eight,’ ‘glacier,’ ‘heir,’ ‘being,’ and over twenty other instances.

As demonstrated, English is a flexible language. That’s what makes it so difficult to fully learn for non-native (and native) speakers and part of why it is currently the closest to being the “global language,” with 85% of the world's international organizations using English as their official language intransnational communication, according to David Crystal, author of English as a Global Language. It can adapt and be adapted as is needed in order for thousands of other verb-forms, sentence structures, and yes, pronouns.

So why can’t it adapt to this not-so-new, but pointed need for a singular genderless pronoun? Even Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary gives it credence, stating, “The use of they, their, them, and themselves as pronouns of indefinite gender and indefinite number is well established in speech and writing, even in literary and formal contexts.” There it is, for those still hung up on it not being “in the rules” or some such nonsense. The basis of language is to serve those speaking it. In our modern world, the human experience is varied and so, too, is our language. To hate on ‘they’ is to be blind to the creative beauty our language holds and insensitive to the changing social tides that drive it.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    thoughts on  writing, art, & new media by glassworks editorial staFF

     


    Archives

    February 2019
    January 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    October 2014
    April 2014
    January 2014
    March 2013
    February 2013


    Categories

    All
    50 Shades Of Grey
    Autocomplete
    Best Seller
    Bibliotherapy
    Book To Movie
    Britannica
    Censorship
    Cliche
    Code Switching
    Controversy
    Drag Queens
    Dystopian
    Editorial
    Education
    Encyclopedia
    Facebook
    Fanfiction
    Fantasy
    Fiction
    Film
    Football
    Future
    Gender
    Genre
    Google
    Google Poetics
    Google Poetry
    Grammar
    Habits
    Health
    Identity
    Insta-love
    Journaling
    Julia Cameron
    Kinesthetic Learning
    Language
    Library
    Literature
    Marginalia
    Media
    Mental Health
    Morning Pages
    Multi Modal
    Multi-modal
    New Media
    Nonfiction
    Normalcy
    Obscenity
    Opinion
    Poetry
    Politics
    Pornography
    Pronoun
    Publishing
    Race
    Research
    Rhetoric
    Sampsa Nuotio
    Scandal
    Science Fiction
    Search
    Self-publishing
    Sequels
    Series
    Sexism
    Slam-poetry
    Social Media
    Spoken Word
    Steven Universe
    Teaching
    Technology
    Television
    The New York Times
    Trigger Warnings
    Trilogy
    Twilight
    Video Games
    Visual Novel
    War
    White Vernacular English
    Wikipedia
    Workshop
    Writing
    YA
    Young Adult

    RSS Feed

Picture

260 Victoria Street • Glassboro, New Jersey 08028 
glassworksmagazine@rowan.edu

All Content on this Site
(C) 2019 glassworks
Photos used under Creative Commons from RomitaGirl67, ** RCB **, George Fox Evangelical Seminary