Glassworks
  • home
  • about
    • history
    • staff bios
    • community outreach
    • affiliations
    • contact
  • current issue
    • read Issue 26
    • letter from the editor
    • looking glass spring 2023
    • interview with Raina J. Leon
    • interview with Sarah Fawn Montgomery
  • submit
    • submission guidelines
  • looking glass
    • through the looking glass
  • editorial content
    • book reviews
    • opinion
    • interviews
  • flash glass
    • flash glass 2023
    • flash glass 2022
    • flash glass 2021
    • flash glass 2020
    • flash glass 2019
    • flash glass 2018
    • flash glass 2017
    • flash glass 2016
    • flash glass 2015
  • media
    • art
    • audio
    • video
  • archive
    • award nominees
    • read and order back issues
  • Master of Arts in Writing program
    • about Writing Arts at Rowan University
    • application and requirements
  • newsletter
  • home
  • about
    • history
    • staff bios
    • community outreach
    • affiliations
    • contact
  • current issue
    • read Issue 26
    • letter from the editor
    • looking glass spring 2023
    • interview with Raina J. Leon
    • interview with Sarah Fawn Montgomery
  • submit
    • submission guidelines
  • looking glass
    • through the looking glass
  • editorial content
    • book reviews
    • opinion
    • interviews
  • flash glass
    • flash glass 2023
    • flash glass 2022
    • flash glass 2021
    • flash glass 2020
    • flash glass 2019
    • flash glass 2018
    • flash glass 2017
    • flash glass 2016
    • flash glass 2015
  • media
    • art
    • audio
    • video
  • archive
    • award nominees
    • read and order back issues
  • Master of Arts in Writing program
    • about Writing Arts at Rowan University
    • application and requirements
  • newsletter
Glassworks

And Cut—Minimalism

5/1/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
by Rebecca Rodriguez

In high school, we are given our first copy of Diana Hacker’s
Rules for Writers, which we are commanded to worship. It’s not a bad book, by any means, and (if read for anything other than MLA citation instructions) specific information on sentence structure can be found within it. In fact, there is an entire section dedicated to taking wordy sentences and tightening them. ←Example→ There is a section on tightening wordy sentences.

​
Although fair warning is given that short sentences aren’t always concise, wordiness is considered ultimately taboo. Not only does it focus on eliminating redundancies, but it encourages us, the writers, to cut inflated phrases (e.g. change “At the present time…” into “Now...” or “Currently...”). We also must take every opportunity to reduce a clause into a phrases, or a phrase into a single word. Though we try not to worry about these rules outside of our research papers, it’s too late. Today’s generation of writers have already been brainwashed.

Picturephoto credit: friends.sfpl via Flickr
While reading a collection of essays from the New York Times entitled Writers on Writing, I came across an essay by E. L. Doctorow where he discusses “Quick Cuts: The Novel Follows Film into a World of Fewer Words,” and asserts how “today’s novelists tend not to write exposition as fully as novelists of the nineteenth century.” This much, I can say, is true. In fact, part of the reason I consider myself to be a minimalist writer may, indeed, be influenced by film. Let’s use chapter 32 of Herman Melville’s Moby Dick as an example. Perhaps, at the time, not everyone was familiar with whales. Most had never seen a whale, nor did they learn much about whales in school. Maybe some (the small percentage who could actually read) found a drawing of a whale in a magazine. Thus, Melville was able to get away with this chapter that seemed (at least from what I recall from high school) to drag on and on and on….

No writer could get away with that today. If the reader were that interested in whales, he could turn on his phone and do independent research. If the writer was that compelled, perhaps he should write for an academic magazine or textbook. See, because of the film Free Willy, everyone is well aware of what a whale looks like. We don’t need all that detail and history. Film has, certainly, taken away some of the exposition that pre-film literature required, but that doesn’t mean film “de-literates thought,” as Doctorow claims. Those with the desire to read will always love reading, and people haven’t started watching more films because they get to think less.

Doctorow blames film and minimalist writing for the drastic difference in sales between books (being significantly lower) to active television viewers statistics. What he doesn’t take into consideration is the percentage of Americans without television access (being significantly lower) compared to the percentage of illiterate Americans. An article from The Huffington Post, entitled “The U.S. Illiteracy Rate Hasn’t Changed In 10 Years” shares that 32 million adults can’t read in the U.S., while 21% of those who are literate can’t read higher than a fifth grade level. Very few people lack the physical ability to watch television, while many more lack the actual skills required to read a book. Yes, laziness plays a role in those who frequent television over books, but illiteracy is an often forgotten factor.

Picturephoto via Pixabay.com
Website Novel Writing Help also shares “9 Rules for Writing Dialogue,” and while I won’t go into detail on each rule, they all revolve around the same idea: everything must advance the plot. If a conversation can be removed without damaging the integrity of the story—cut it. And why stop at unnecessary dialogue? Does the color of the accent chair in the corner of the living room really advance the plot? Unless a character has spilled red wine on it, forget the description of the accent chair. Film generally moves quickly, and now we want our novels to do the same. We don’t care about the eye color of the cashier where you are buying your cigarettes; we only care that you are buying the cigarettes after not smoking for twenty years because, as it is later revealed, your husband has cheated on you with your mother (not based off of a true story). Let’s keep the relevant stuff and toss the rest. 

The blend of film’s vast exposure with years of programmed MLA guidelines and techniques on writing just might be the reason for increased minimalism today. Film, if anything, has only sparked creativity and encouraged writers to keep writing—with less unnecessary exposition. Minimalist writing only increases the rate at which we process information, and what’s wrong with that? It still requires the same amount of energy and concentration. Film is the visual representation of writing, and the lack of active readers has very little to do with the production of film. Perhaps the writing world can use film to promote reading, or maybe our public schools need to offer more English courses that inspire children to love reading (or using their brain in general). Film and reading go hand and hand—one cannot hurt the other, only better it.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    September 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    October 2014
    April 2014
    January 2014
    March 2013
    February 2013


    Categories

    All
    Art
    Audio
    Bestseller
    Bibliotherapy
    Books
    Bookstores
    Career
    Cartoons
    Censorship
    Characters
    Cliche
    Code-switching
    Comedy
    Comics
    Controversy
    Culture
    Dyslexia
    Dystopian
    E-books
    Editorial
    Education
    Emoji
    Encyclopedia
    English
    Facebook
    Fandom
    Fanfiction
    Fantasy
    Fiction
    Film
    Future
    Gamebooks
    Gender
    Genre
    Google
    Grammar
    Habits
    Halloween
    Health
    Identity
    Journaling
    Kinesthetic Learning
    Language
    LGBTQ
    Library
    Literacy
    Literature
    Manga
    Marginalia
    Media
    Mental Health
    Multimodal
    Music
    New Media
    New York Times Best Seller List
    Nihilism
    Nonfiction
    Normalcy
    Nostalgia
    Obscenity
    Op Ed
    Opinion
    Pandemic
    Podcast
    Poetry
    Politics
    Process
    Pronouns
    Publishing
    Race
    Reading
    Rebuttal
    Research
    Rhetoric
    Rules
    Science Fiction
    Search
    Self-publishing
    Sequels
    Series
    Sexism
    Social Media
    Spoken Word
    Sports
    Standards
    Storytelling
    Student Writing
    Superheroes
    Teaching
    Technology
    Television
    The New York Times
    Trigger Warnings
    Trilogy
    Video Games
    Visual Novel
    War
    Wikipedia
    Workshop
    Writing
    Young Adult
    Zines


    RSS Feed


Picture

glassworks is a publication of
​Rowan University's Master of Arts in Writing
260 Victoria Street • Glassboro, New Jersey 08028 
glassworksmagazine@rowan.edu
​All Content on this Site (c) 2023 glassworks
Photos used under Creative Commons from RomitaGirl67, ** RCB **, George Fox Evangelical Seminary