Glassworks
  • home
  • about
    • history
    • staff bios
    • community outreach
    • affiliations
    • contact
  • current issue
    • read Issue 26
    • letter from the editor
    • looking glass spring 2023
    • interview with Raina J. Leon
    • interview with Sarah Fawn Montgomery
  • submit
    • submission guidelines
  • looking glass
    • through the looking glass
  • editorial content
    • book reviews
    • opinion
    • interviews
  • flash glass
    • flash glass 2023
    • flash glass 2022
    • flash glass 2021
    • flash glass 2020
    • flash glass 2019
    • flash glass 2018
    • flash glass 2017
    • flash glass 2016
    • flash glass 2015
  • media
    • art
    • audio
    • video
  • archive
    • award nominees
    • read and order back issues
  • Master of Arts in Writing program
    • about Writing Arts at Rowan University
    • application and requirements
  • newsletter
  • home
  • about
    • history
    • staff bios
    • community outreach
    • affiliations
    • contact
  • current issue
    • read Issue 26
    • letter from the editor
    • looking glass spring 2023
    • interview with Raina J. Leon
    • interview with Sarah Fawn Montgomery
  • submit
    • submission guidelines
  • looking glass
    • through the looking glass
  • editorial content
    • book reviews
    • opinion
    • interviews
  • flash glass
    • flash glass 2023
    • flash glass 2022
    • flash glass 2021
    • flash glass 2020
    • flash glass 2019
    • flash glass 2018
    • flash glass 2017
    • flash glass 2016
    • flash glass 2015
  • media
    • art
    • audio
    • video
  • archive
    • award nominees
    • read and order back issues
  • Master of Arts in Writing program
    • about Writing Arts at Rowan University
    • application and requirements
  • newsletter
Glassworks

Farewell, Thought Bubbles!

8/1/2021

0 Comments

 
by Thomas LaPorte
Picture
Photo by Mika Baumeister on Unsplash
A few weeks ago, I started reading “The Death of Superman” story arc. This was a massive comics storyline during the 1990s, one which is still discussed to this day. When I opened the first page, I noticed something I haven’t seen in a long time, something once considered a convention of comics: thought bubbles. See, I have dedicated my comic reading to issues from 2000-2011; by that time, thought bubbles had completely vanished from comic panels. In fact, comic storytelling overall had changed, and I believe a major part of it was due to the extinction of thought bubbles.
Since superhero comics first made their appearance in 1938 with the dawn of Superman, thought bubbles were used to convey plot and inner dialogue; they were a staple of the comics genre. However, somewhere in the 1990s, the thought bubbles seemingly vanished from comics. Comic thought bubbles are a hindrance to modern comic books and they should stay gone.
The first modern comic book thought bubble appears in superhero comics on page 1 of Action Comics #8 (released January 4, 1939). This bubble is characterized by mirroring the amount of space that a speech bubble has. There is text within this bubble, sometimes in italics. But the defining characteristics of modern thought bubbles are the tiny white bubbles connecting the character to their thought. ​​
Picture
Action Comics #8 page 1 (released January 4, 1939) by DC Comics
Thought bubbles started to wane in the 1990s, when comics became engulfed in realism; stories were harsh and dark and devastating. This followed the debut of Watchmen by Alan Moore and The Dark Knight Returns by Frank Miller, which were stories notorious for bringing comics into a mature and adult world. Storytelling was changing. Comics started becoming adult, and dialogue and text needed to fit that idea. Suddenly, thought bubbles started vanishing. Storytelling got tighter and words were used more efficiently. Thought bubbles were most commonly used for recapitulation, exposition, and word waste. Rarely were they adding anything new to the story; if anything, they interrupted the natural flow of the stories. They were almost amateur. 
Picture
Superman: The Man of Steel #20 page 6 (released December 14, 1992) by DC Comics
In the above comic following Superman’s death, we see Lois grieving, but there’s really nothing differentiating this scene from any of her other scenes. Her thought bubbles here are nothing but a device to help the reader understand something they don’t need to know. “Crowd’s lining the sidewalk ten deep. Gonna have to fight my way through. I’m coming” literally just told us what we will see happen on the next page after this one. We don’t need that exposition. It is almost demeaning to the audience, as if we aren’t smart enough to understand movement. This is an actual representation of thought bubbles and how they were used and abused. Of course, some were short and sweet, but a good faction were just recapitulation and word waste. 

I am not against thought in comics; I am against the unnecessary exposition and word waste found within thought bubbles. The solution to word waste became clear when I opened an issue later in the “Reign of the Supermen” storyline. It was a modern text box, not necessarily new to comics, but its newest function was to convey thought—though these thoughts did not recapitulate. Instead, their role was to actually show the character’s reactions and thoughts to events. They were used to move the story forward instead of holding the story back and recapitulating. They fundamentally changed the pacing and movement of stories. This was the way storytelling was meant to be. This is why text boxes are better than thought bubbles.  

Take this splash page from Green Arrow Year One #2 as an example.
Picture
Green Arrow: Year One #2 page 5 (released July 25, 2007) by DC Comics
Here we get the inner monologue of Green Arrow (Aka. Oliver Queen), which isn’t explaining he just got trapped on an island last issue. Instead, it is telling us Oliver feels like he’s hungover, but not from drinking. “Skull feels like a pressure cooker." We’re actually gaining something by learning what Oliver feels and senses. “As if at any moment I might stumble across a beach-front hotel with a pool-side bar. Just around the next corner, I keep telling myself…” We have gained so much on this page. We learn what Oliver wants, what kind of person he is: rich, and a frequenter of fancy hotels. Yet, at the moment he is not. He is isolated. This is how thoughts should be used. To give us real depth into a story. Anything less is not giving enough credit to the character. 

When comparing these two different techniques in thought portrayal, I realize what I want from comic character thoughts is depth; I want every word to mean something because every word should mean something. Especially when there aren’t many words on a page to begin with.  

To me, thought bubbles did not have this effect; however, text boxes do. The modern storytelling device is effective and allows for deeper relations to characters. I feel like I truly know characters that use this method. For this purpose, thought bubbles should stay gone. 

Long live text boxes!
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    September 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    October 2014
    April 2014
    January 2014
    March 2013
    February 2013


    Categories

    All
    Art
    Audio
    Bestseller
    Bibliotherapy
    Books
    Bookstores
    Career
    Cartoons
    Censorship
    Characters
    Cliche
    Code-switching
    Comedy
    Comics
    Controversy
    Culture
    Dyslexia
    Dystopian
    E-books
    Editorial
    Education
    Emoji
    Encyclopedia
    English
    Facebook
    Fandom
    Fanfiction
    Fantasy
    Fiction
    Film
    Future
    Gamebooks
    Gender
    Genre
    Google
    Grammar
    Habits
    Halloween
    Health
    Identity
    Journaling
    Kinesthetic Learning
    Language
    LGBTQ
    Library
    Literacy
    Literature
    Manga
    Marginalia
    Media
    Mental Health
    Multimodal
    Music
    New Media
    New York Times Best Seller List
    Nihilism
    Nonfiction
    Normalcy
    Nostalgia
    Obscenity
    Op Ed
    Opinion
    Pandemic
    Podcast
    Poetry
    Politics
    Process
    Pronouns
    Publishing
    Race
    Reading
    Rebuttal
    Research
    Rhetoric
    Rules
    Science Fiction
    Search
    Self-publishing
    Sequels
    Series
    Sexism
    Social Media
    Spoken Word
    Sports
    Standards
    Storytelling
    Student Writing
    Superheroes
    Teaching
    Technology
    Television
    The New York Times
    Trigger Warnings
    Trilogy
    Video Games
    Visual Novel
    War
    Wikipedia
    Workshop
    Writing
    Young Adult
    Zines


    RSS Feed


Picture

glassworks is a publication of
​Rowan University's Master of Arts in Writing
260 Victoria Street • Glassboro, New Jersey 08028 
glassworksmagazine@rowan.edu
​All Content on this Site (c) 2023 glassworks
Photos used under Creative Commons from RomitaGirl67, ** RCB **, George Fox Evangelical Seminary