GLASSWORKS
  • home
  • about
    • history
    • staff bios
    • community outreach
    • affiliations
    • contact
  • Current Issue
    • read Issue 30
    • letter from the editor
    • looking glass spring 2025
    • interview with Dale M. Kushner
    • interview with Jessie vanEerden
  • submit
    • submission guidelines
  • looking glass
    • spring 2025
  • editorial content
    • book reviews
    • opinion
    • interviews >
      • Dale M. Kushner
      • Jessie vanEerden
  • flash glass
    • flash glass 2025
    • flash glass 2024
    • flash glass 2023
    • flash glass 2022
    • flash glass 2021
    • flash glass 2020
    • flash glass 2019
    • flash glass 2018
    • flash glass 2017
    • flash glass 2016
    • flash glass 2015
  • media
    • art
    • audio
    • video
  • archive
    • best of the net nominees
    • pushcart prize nominees
    • read and order back issues
  • Master of Arts in Writing Program
    • about Writing Arts at Rowan University
    • application and requirements
  • Newsletter
  • home
  • about
    • history
    • staff bios
    • community outreach
    • affiliations
    • contact
  • Current Issue
    • read Issue 30
    • letter from the editor
    • looking glass spring 2025
    • interview with Dale M. Kushner
    • interview with Jessie vanEerden
  • submit
    • submission guidelines
  • looking glass
    • spring 2025
  • editorial content
    • book reviews
    • opinion
    • interviews >
      • Dale M. Kushner
      • Jessie vanEerden
  • flash glass
    • flash glass 2025
    • flash glass 2024
    • flash glass 2023
    • flash glass 2022
    • flash glass 2021
    • flash glass 2020
    • flash glass 2019
    • flash glass 2018
    • flash glass 2017
    • flash glass 2016
    • flash glass 2015
  • media
    • art
    • audio
    • video
  • archive
    • best of the net nominees
    • pushcart prize nominees
    • read and order back issues
  • Master of Arts in Writing Program
    • about Writing Arts at Rowan University
    • application and requirements
  • Newsletter
GLASSWORKS

I have a problem with timed essay-writing, and you should too

9/1/2023

2 Comments

 
by Rebecca Green
In my College Composition I class last semester, I assigned a personal narrative essay to my students. When I initially reviewed the project guidelines, I was worried. What if they won’t gain anything from this essay? What if they struggle to connect sources to their own personal experience?
Picture
Photo by Christin Hume on Unsplash
I was hesitant, but I knew my students deserved the opportunity to write about themselves, to be creative, to take risks and not feel restricted by strict project expectations. I prepared them as best as I could: we spent weeks close reading, responding to sources, discussing our topics, and partaking in creative free-write exercises as a class. We talked about writing as a process, instead of a five paragraph formula. When that fateful Friday night arrived in which students were expected to hand in their essays, I sat by the computer anxiously waiting for a disaster to take place. 
The young writers in my class flourished. Liam — who always shows up to class fifteen minutes late and rolls his eyes as each slide clicks by — wrote a touching story about coming to terms with the declining health of an aging relative.
Picture
Photo by Alexis Brown on Unsplash
Jenna — who is perpetually on the brink of raising her hand and saying something brilliant — penned an emotional story about a vacation spot she and her family can no longer return to. Grading, a previously droll task, was suddenly accompanied by popcorn and excitement over how successful the assignment was.
A resounding comment appeared during conferences: This was the first time in a while that I was able to be creative in my writing. Haley, a STEM major, told me this essay resparked her love for writing, which was cruelly crushed during her AP English class experience in high school. She said she is considering switching majors and dropping math forever. Amanda told me about how standardized testing killed her creativity. She found she no longer wanted to write after strenuous years of teachers and administrators expecting perfection within a limited time frame. She found it difficult to write about sources she only had a few moments to familiarize herself with. She was glad we spent weeks — instead of minutes — reading and responding to each source.
I’m just going to say it: enough is enough.
How can we ever expect the future generation to learn the beauty, pain, and patience of writing if we do not allow them to do so during their formative years? Writing should never be restricted to a first draft, to a time frame of forty minutes. Standardized tests misrepresent the reality of writing. Writing is a process. We should encourage “shitty” first drafts, as Anne Lamott would say. We can not and should not grade students on an essay that was written in only forty minutes, in which the student had to read the prompt, think up a thesis, and write it all out. Doing so goes against the essence of writing, and it teaches students to denounce their work if it isn’t perfect on the first try. What takes weeks in a college level class (reading sources, understanding the expectations and nuances of the genre, and developing a specific focus for the upcoming essay) is reduced to forty minutes. ​
Not only do standardized tests impose strict time limits, but they also enforce the formulaic five-paragraph essay format, in which students must rush through a piece of writing they are not familiar with and then also write something analytical or interesting about it. Why not incorporate a personal narrative on these tests? Why not, at least, allow students to write about subjects or pieces of writing they are familiar with? In the real world, don’t we expect that people will take the time to research something before publishing information about it? Why aren’t we allowing high school students to practice more practical processes of writing? Aren’t standardized tests teaching students that their future writing should be rushed, hurried, and not 100% researched and accurate?
In 2014, 33 students at the Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology were given permission by their teacher to abandon the typical essay format on the Virginia EOC Writing Test and wrote in creative forms: plays, short stories, letters, interviews, etc. According to Michael H. Miller, the students’ English teacher, all 33 students passed with high scores. It is possible to write “successfully” (by standardized testing criteria) without abandoning creativity and individuality. Why cram our brilliant students into a five paragraph structure, a three-point thesis statement, an inability to write inquisitively? ​
We are losing the voices of our students, of future generations. Brilliant writers are walking away from the craft after receiving poor grades on essays written within strict time frames. We need to allow students to write creatively. We need to allow students to experience the process of writing, of chipping away at a draft until it is ready for the world. We need to allow our students the freedom to write a draft that isn’t perfect, with the knowledge that they can always return to it and try again. Imagine all the potential we are preventing these young writers from reaching. If we don’t do something soon, we’ll have a world of first drafts and disillusioned writers instead of polished pieces and patience.
*all student names are pseudonyms
2 Comments
Elizabeth Wallace link
10/1/2023 01:57:32 pm

I recently, within the last week, read an article about how the ETS is reconsidering timing on their tests. They must have been thinking about it for awhile to have made any kind of statement. Perhaps you might look into it.


Reply
Teknik Energi link
2/25/2025 07:15:54 am

What advice would you give to those just starting to explore this topic? How do you see your development in the future? Are there emerging trends we should pay attention to?Regard <a href="https://beee.telkomuniversity.ac.id/pengabdian-masyarakat-di-desa-sayati/">Teknik Energi</a>

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    September 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    October 2014
    April 2014
    January 2014
    March 2013
    February 2013


    Categories

    All
    Accessibility
    Art
    Audio
    Bestseller
    Bibliotherapy
    Books
    Bookstores
    BookTok
    Career
    Cartoons
    Celebrities
    Censorship
    Characters
    Cliche
    Code-switching
    Comedy
    Comics
    Controversy
    Culture
    Disability Awareness
    Dyslexia
    Dystopian
    E-books
    Editorial
    Education
    Emoji
    Encyclopedia
    English
    Facebook
    Fandom
    Fanfiction
    Fantasy
    Fiction
    Film
    Future
    Gamebooks
    Gender
    Genre
    Ghostwriting
    Google
    Grammar
    Habits
    Halloween
    Health
    Identity
    Journaling
    Kinesthetic Learning
    Language
    LGBTQ
    Library
    Literacy
    Literature
    Manga
    Marginalia
    Media
    Mental Health
    Movies
    Multi-genre
    Multimodal
    Music
    New Media
    New York Times Best Seller List
    Nihilism
    Nonfiction
    Normalcy
    Nostalgia
    Obscenity
    Op Ed
    Pandemic
    Podcast
    Poetry
    Politics
    Process
    Pronouns
    Publishing
    Race
    Reading
    Rebuttal
    Research
    Review
    Rhetoric
    Rules
    Science Fiction
    Search
    Self Publishing
    Self-publishing
    Sequels
    Series
    Sexism
    Social Media
    Spoken Word
    Sports
    Standards
    Storytelling
    Student Writing
    Superheroes
    Teaching
    Technology
    Television
    The New York Times
    Trigger Warnings
    Trilogy
    Video Games
    Visual Novel
    War
    Wikipedia
    Workshop
    Writing
    Young Adult
    Zines


    RSS Feed


Picture

Glassworks is a publication of
​Rowan University's Master of Arts in Writing
260 Victoria Street • Glassboro, New Jersey 08028 
[email protected]

​All Content on this Site (c) 2025 Glassworks
Photos from RomitaGirl67, wuestenigel, shixart1985 (CC BY 2.0), ** RCB **, George Fox Evangelical Seminary, shixart1985 (CC BY 2.0), educators.co.uk, andreavallejos, .v1ctor Casale., shixart1985, ginnerobot, brizzle born and bred, edenpictures, Phil Roeder, markus119, andreavallejos, kevinmarsh, steevithak, shixart1985, Joris Leermakers, Book Catalog, shixart1985