GLASSWORKS
  • home
  • about
    • history
    • staff bios
    • community outreach
    • affiliations
    • contact
  • Current Issue
    • read Issue 30
    • letter from the editor
    • looking glass spring 2025
    • interview with Dale M. Kushner
    • interview with Jessie vanEerden
  • submit
    • submission guidelines
  • looking glass
    • spring 2025
  • editorial content
    • book reviews
    • opinion
    • interviews >
      • Dale M. Kushner
      • Jessie vanEerden
  • flash glass
    • flash glass 2025
    • flash glass 2024
    • flash glass 2023
    • flash glass 2022
    • flash glass 2021
    • flash glass 2020
    • flash glass 2019
    • flash glass 2018
    • flash glass 2017
    • flash glass 2016
    • flash glass 2015
  • media
    • art
    • audio
    • video
  • archive
    • best of the net nominees
    • pushcart prize nominees
    • read and order back issues
  • Master of Arts in Writing Program
    • about Writing Arts at Rowan University
    • application and requirements
  • Newsletter
  • home
  • about
    • history
    • staff bios
    • community outreach
    • affiliations
    • contact
  • Current Issue
    • read Issue 30
    • letter from the editor
    • looking glass spring 2025
    • interview with Dale M. Kushner
    • interview with Jessie vanEerden
  • submit
    • submission guidelines
  • looking glass
    • spring 2025
  • editorial content
    • book reviews
    • opinion
    • interviews >
      • Dale M. Kushner
      • Jessie vanEerden
  • flash glass
    • flash glass 2025
    • flash glass 2024
    • flash glass 2023
    • flash glass 2022
    • flash glass 2021
    • flash glass 2020
    • flash glass 2019
    • flash glass 2018
    • flash glass 2017
    • flash glass 2016
    • flash glass 2015
  • media
    • art
    • audio
    • video
  • archive
    • best of the net nominees
    • pushcart prize nominees
    • read and order back issues
  • Master of Arts in Writing Program
    • about Writing Arts at Rowan University
    • application and requirements
  • Newsletter
GLASSWORKS

Someone Talked: Spoilers in the Modern Age

1/16/2015

0 Comments

 
by Andrew Bates

There are certain unspoken rules amongst aficionados of media. One must always have a personal list of at least ten favorite works to call “the best” when called upon by others. When topics such as Twilight and 50 Shades of Grey come up, they must immediately refute them as terrible and trite. Using your cell phone in a dark movie theater is sacrilege. The arguably most important rule, and the one that is most common amongst media absorption, is that one must not reveal important dramatic turn of events.

In other words, tag your spoilers.
Picture
credit: The Daily Fandom
The term can be traced back to the early days of newsgroups and Usenet, where users would appropriately put enough blank lines to shove the spoiler into a new page. During this time period, a majority of media absorption was communal as just about everyone experienced it at the same time. The VCR was expensive and was not financially viable for most. With the incorporation of social media and the prevalence of DVR technology, those blank lines are shrinking.

The desired need of spoiler alerts is, at the very least, commendable. The very existence of the idea of spoilers shows how much emotional respect there is for the power of the narrative. A lot of this respect comes down to our desire to be emotionally moved and engrossed by the plot. In a 2005 article by the late Roger Ebert, he noted that “moviegoers do NOT want to be informed of key plot surprises.” Content creators often put in their whole heart and soul into a work, and experiencing the reactions (see: reactions to The Red Wedding) is one of the most fulfilling rewards of being an artist. At the same time, a large majority of modern content creation is geared towards getting eyes in front of advertisements. This is where we come to a conundrum.

The very goal of social media is to get audiences constantly interacting with the brand. For example, television channels need their viewers to remain on their channel to increase exposure to advertisements, or gain a higher cost per thousand (CPM). A higher CPM allows the stations to charge a higher rate for advertisement space. To do this, television marketing often incorporates hashtags into the show to encourage live tweeting and will have cast members or show creators participate in social media discussions. Networks barrage media platforms with GIF reactions and a play-by-play take on the audience's emotional viewpoint  In addition, content aggregators such as Reddit and 4chan often feature discussions literally moments after a work’s release. Along with the advent of social media, technology now allows us to partake in media at different times. Only recently did Nielsen, a viewer measurement service, began documenting DVR use days after an episode’s debut. With the phasing out of communal viewing, it’s getting to the point where we literally avoid Twitter, Facebook, and even other viewers to avoid having the plot spoiled.

This utmost respect for the narrative and the plot is ultimately destroying the purpose of partaking and experiencing media. We, myself included at times, are no longer interested in the aesthetic qualities and thematic elements of a work. Very rarely do I see discussions, whether online or in person, that go beyond the topic of what will happen on the next installment or which character will be killed off the proverbial island next. In other words, we care more about the plot than we do the story. This overarching focus on plot rather than the story and its themes ultimately takes away the emotional power of media. Whether it’s a film, a novel, or even a book, media and culture should challenge the way we look at the world. Humanity has natural desire to be voyeuristic and media thrives on that, allowing us to observe the world through a new light.

The issue is that we come so engrossed in the plot and avoiding spoiling that we fail to recognize why we are moved. I find that outside of academic circles, there’s no true discussion on the emotional power media has. There’s such a fear of ruining the experience for someone else that we don’t acknowledge our own. Most marketing campaigns discuss the awe and amazement that comes from work, with very few highlighting the emotional effect that comes from it. I find myself silently reflecting on my experiences with a selected work and ultimately coming up even lonelier because there’s more interest in the “what comes next” rather than “why was this moving.” We censor ourselves and by failing to be true and honest with our relationship to the work, we fail to connect to others. We don’t discuss how the view presented differs from our own. There’s no talk of the emotional effect of seeing a different world. We’re just simply absorbing the media for the sake of absorbing it.

I find myself being reminded of French cultural critic Roland Barthes’ essay Leaving the Movie Theatre. As Barthes discusses his enjoyment of leaving the theatre, he begins to note how he begins to get engrossed in the film, but also in the people around him and how they react. Seeing how they react makes him feel a part of something – it gives a welcoming communal feel. Whether it was the Red Wedding from Game of Thrones or the death of Agent Coulson in the 2011 comic book actioner The Avengers, experiencing something and sharing it with others has tremendous emotional power. Even if we’re aware of what happens, we can still feel that emotional impact. Our focus on spoilers does just the opposite, it takes away the communal feel and makes us numb to the effects of others. We are too worried about spoiling that we’d rather just be by ourselves. We’d rather feel that shock alone than feel it with others. It’s a good thing to have something spoiled every now and then. A spoiler, in a way, is the band-aid rip that we need. It removes us from our own world and opens our eyes to the larger world, both the world of the creator and the world around us.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    September 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    October 2014
    April 2014
    January 2014
    March 2013
    February 2013


    Categories

    All
    Accessibility
    Art
    Audio
    Bestseller
    Bibliotherapy
    Books
    Bookstores
    BookTok
    Career
    Cartoons
    Celebrities
    Censorship
    Characters
    Cliche
    Code-switching
    Comedy
    Comics
    Controversy
    Culture
    Disability Awareness
    Dyslexia
    Dystopian
    E-books
    Editorial
    Education
    Emoji
    Encyclopedia
    English
    Facebook
    Fandom
    Fanfiction
    Fantasy
    Fiction
    Film
    Future
    Gamebooks
    Gender
    Genre
    Ghostwriting
    Google
    Grammar
    Habits
    Halloween
    Health
    Identity
    Journaling
    Kinesthetic Learning
    Language
    LGBTQ
    Library
    Literacy
    Literature
    Manga
    Marginalia
    Media
    Mental Health
    Movies
    Multi-genre
    Multimodal
    Music
    New Media
    New York Times Best Seller List
    Nihilism
    Nonfiction
    Normalcy
    Nostalgia
    Obscenity
    Op Ed
    Pandemic
    Podcast
    Poetry
    Politics
    Process
    Pronouns
    Publishing
    Race
    Reading
    Rebuttal
    Research
    Review
    Rhetoric
    Rules
    Science Fiction
    Search
    Self Publishing
    Self-publishing
    Sequels
    Series
    Sexism
    Social Media
    Spoken Word
    Sports
    Standards
    Storytelling
    Student Writing
    Superheroes
    Teaching
    Technology
    Television
    The New York Times
    Trigger Warnings
    Trilogy
    Video Games
    Visual Novel
    War
    Wikipedia
    Workshop
    Writing
    Young Adult
    Zines


    RSS Feed


Picture

Glassworks is a publication of
​Rowan University's Master of Arts in Writing
260 Victoria Street • Glassboro, New Jersey 08028 
[email protected]

​All Content on this Site (c) 2025 Glassworks
Photos from RomitaGirl67, wuestenigel, shixart1985 (CC BY 2.0), ** RCB **, George Fox Evangelical Seminary, shixart1985 (CC BY 2.0), educators.co.uk, andreavallejos, .v1ctor Casale., shixart1985, ginnerobot, brizzle born and bred, edenpictures, Phil Roeder, markus119, andreavallejos, kevinmarsh, steevithak, shixart1985, Joris Leermakers, Book Catalog, shixart1985